FIRST RESPONSE OF THE ME25 ACTION COMMITTEE

 

 

History:  In the summer of 2009, the church board made the decision to use the ME25 (a strengths-based survey instrument from the Gallup organization) as a church-wide assessment instrument.  The survey was taken during the month of November.  Results were received in December, and the committee met to review the results in January.

 

To supplement the ME25, twenty one-on-one interviews were conducted.  This qualitative data was gathered to provide a context in which to understand the quantitative data of the ME25.

 

Overview of the results:  The ME25 focuses on the level of engagement of the people in the church.  The good news is that our church scored higher than the average in the percentage of people engaged (37% of our congregation vs. 29% of all churches surveyed).  The concern is that we also scored higher in the percentage of those actively disengaged (21% of our congregation vs. 17% of all churches surveyed).

 

The survey indicates that the people of our church are more spiritually committed than the average church; however, our overall spiritual health would improve if we increase the level of engagement people have with this local body of believers.  The interviews support these findings.  People believe we are fulfilling our mission, but remain uncertain as to how to be healing agents.  There is a commitment to spiritual growth (discipleship), but a partial disconnect in using oneŐs gifts and strengths in the church and the marketplace.

 

Key Issues:  Areas in which we scored low include the following two questions:

1)    As a member of my church, I know what is expected of me.

2)    In my church, I regularly have the opportunity to do what I do best.

We believe we can address these two issues through better communication and training.

a.    We need to help people discover their gifts/strengths, and to understand the way disciples use those gifts to further GodŐs Kingdom.

b.    We need to identify the needs in the church and community, and communicate those needs to the people.

Our lowest score was on the following question:

3)    In the last six months, someone in my church has talked to me about the progress of my spiritual growth.

The church ought to be a place where conversations about spiritual growth regularly happen.  We would like to make spiritual progress a normal part of our conversations.  We want to make these conversations graceful, but intentional.

a.    We will talk about it on Sunday morning.

b.    We will encourage classes and small groups to address spiritual progress.

c.     We will attempt to make these discussions a part of our church culture.

Finally, we scored well on the following question.

4)    In the last month, I have received recognition or praise from someone in my church.

We want to be a church of affirmation and encouragement.  We are glad we are doing well, but we would like to build on this strength because we feel we can do much better.

a.    We need to do a better job of sharing the great successes of the people of our church.

b.    We need to teach the skills associated with affirmation, encouragement and recognition.

 

An issue that was mentioned throughout the discussion was communication.  The committee believes that improved communication will make us better in every area.  We need to explore electronic mediums, written materials, and phone & public platforms.  We need to consider it in our budget and personnel planning.  The committee will help us create a strategy for communication with a focus toward the four issues listed above.

 

 

POSSIBLE AREAS OF CONSIDERATION

 

We need to consider staffing for evangelism and assimilation.

Children and community

Senior citizens

University

 

We need to enhance our systems for visitor recognition, follow up, assimilation and attrition.

We need to ask the youth staff to lead us.

We need to ask the growing small groups to lead us.